CBI issued a press release clarifying its stand and explained how the raid on NDTV promoters was in consonance with the law and done with prior approvals. The provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are applicable to the officials of private banks.
The Central Bureau of Investigation has often been accused of working
at the behest of the Central government. Even the Supreme Court, in
2013, had called the investigating agency as a ‘caged parrot’ and ‘its
master’s voice.’ In the back drop of the raids against NDTV promoters
Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, the CBI is once again facing accusations of
being partisan. In its response, the CBI issued a press release on June
6, 2017 stating how the investigation carried by the CBI in the NDTV
raid was legal and in terms with the Supreme Court ruling over private
bank investigations.
The NDTV promoters have been alleged of “the wrongful gain of Rs 48
crore to the promoters – Dr. Prannoy Roy, Smt Radhika Roy, M/s RRPR
Holdings Pvt Ltd and a corresponding wrongful loss to the ICICI bank,”
under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Raid on NDTV promoters and the alleged “wrongful” investigation
Section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act covers
investigations to be carried out by the CBI if an offence is alleged to
have been committed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with a
prior approval of the Central Government.
In the pressing matter, CBI has been accused of not having
jurisdiction in cases involving private bank loans, which the CBI
clarified in its statement, “the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of
Ramesh Gelli vs CBI of 2016, held that the provisions of Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 are applicable to the officials of private banks.
Therefore, CBI has jurisdiction to take up investigation of the cases of
private banks.”
What is the Ramesh Gelli vs CBI [WP(CRL.) NO. 167/ 2015] case?
In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 2(c)(viii) of the
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 21 of the Indian Penal
Code, 1860 defining “public servant” should be read with Section 46-A of
Banking Regulation Act, which holds the field for the purposes of
offences under the said Act.
The question in hand was to determine whether the chairman/managing
director or executive director of a private bank operating under licence
issued by RBI under Banking Regulation Act, 1949, held/holds an office
and performed /performs public duty so as to attract the definition of
‘public servant’.
What is the jurisdiction of a CBI investigation?
Offences related to the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 falls under
the supervision of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and in other
matters with the Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT) in the
Ministry of Personnel, Pension and Grievances of the Government of
India.
CBI investigates cases which are essentially against Central
Government employees, financial interests of the Central government,
breach of Central Laws, fraud, cheating embezzlement relating to
companies involving large funds, similar offences committed by organised
gangs or criminals affecting several states.
It also looks into cases having interstate and international
ramifications and involving several official agencies where, from all
angles, it is considered necessary that a single investigating agency
should be in charge of the investigation.
Are CBI arrests different from police arrests?
CBI arrests, with or without warrant, and its procedure is derived
from the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, 1973, which applies to every
police officer making an arrest where an approval from the Magistrate is
required if an arrest is made with a warrant. Provisions of an arrest
without a warrant are embed in Section 41 of CrPc which is also
applicable to the CBI officials.
After making an arrest, CBI follows a prescribed investigative
procedure governed by the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946
(DSPE). Stating the investigative powers to the CBI (Section 6A of the
DSPE Act), the DSPE also defines the jurisdiction (Section 5) under
which the institution lies.
Source : http://indianexpress.com
No comments:
Post a Comment